[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXPaX-+R6Z9LqZp0uOVmq-TUX_ksPbUL7mnfbdqo6z2AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 21:21:22 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Adin Scannell <ascannell@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: TLB flushes on fixmap changes
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 7:23 PM, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 21:23:26 -0700
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>> Couldn't text_poke() use kmap_atomic()? Or, even better, just change CR3?
>
> No, since kmap_atomic() is only for x86_32 and highmem support kernel.
> In x86-64, it seems that returns just a page address. That is not
> good for text_poke, since it needs to make a writable alias for RO
> code page. Hmm, maybe, can we mimic copy_oldmem_page(), it uses ioremap_cache?
>
I just re-read text_poke(). It's, um, horrible. Not only is the
implementation overcomplicated and probably buggy, but it's SLOOOOOW.
It's totally the wrong API -- poking one instruction at a time
basically can't be efficient on x86. The API should either poke lots
of instructions at once or should be text_poke_begin(); ...;
text_poke_end();.
Anyway, the attached patch seems to boot. Linus, Kees, etc: is this
too scary of an approach? With the patch applied, text_poke() is a
fantastic exploit target. On the other hand, even without the patch
applied, text_poke() is every bit as juicy.
--Andy
View attachment "text_poke.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1628 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists