[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180827083852.GF24695@krava>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:38:52 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2]: perf record: enable asynchronous trace writing
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 07:47:01PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
SNIP
> static int record__mmap_read_evlist(struct record *rec, struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> bool overwrite)
> {
> u64 bytes_written = rec->bytes_written;
> - int i;
> - int rc = 0;
> + int i, rc = 0;
> struct perf_mmap *maps;
> + int trace_fd = rec->session->data->file.fd;
> + struct aiocb **mmap_aio = rec->evlist->mmap_aio;
> + int mmap_aio_size = 0;
> + off_t off;
>
> if (!evlist)
> return 0;
> @@ -546,14 +620,17 @@ static int record__mmap_read_evlist(struct record *rec, struct perf_evlist *evli
> if (overwrite && evlist->bkw_mmap_state != BKW_MMAP_DATA_PENDING)
> return 0;
>
> + off = lseek(trace_fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
> +
with async write, do we need to query/set the offset like this
all the time?
could we just keep/update the offset value in the 'struct perf_data_file'
and skip both lseek calls?
jirka
SNIP
>
> + record__mmap_read_sync(trace_fd, mmap_aio, mmap_aio_size, rec);
> +
> + lseek(trace_fd, off, SEEK_SET);
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists