[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180827085708.GA27172@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 01:57:08 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Adin Scannell <ascannell@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: removig ia64, was: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/tlb, x86/mm: Support
invalidating TLB caches for RCU_TABLE_FREE
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 09:47:01AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> sh is trivial, arm seems doable, with a bit of luck we can do 'rm -rf
> arch/ia64' leaving us with s390.
Is removing ia64 a serious plan? It is the cause for a fair share of
oddities in dma lang, and I did not have much luck getting maintainer
replies lately, but I didn't know of a plan to get rid of it.
What is the state of people still using ia64 mainline kernels vs just
old distros in the still existing machines?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists