[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWPuqfXOgh_-qp8q6wATU3Lj_WpX0bAOxPBX76SKvyXCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:40:37 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: can: rcar_can: Add r8a774a1 support
Hi Fabrizio,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 3:08 PM Fabrizio Castro
<fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com> wrote:>
> Document RZ/G2M (r8a774a1) SoC specific bindings and RZ/G2
> generic bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/rcar_can.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/rcar_can.txt
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Renesas R-Car CAN controller Device Tree Bindings
> Required properties:
> - compatible: "renesas,can-r8a7743" if CAN controller is a part of R8A7743 SoC.
> "renesas,can-r8a7745" if CAN controller is a part of R8A7745 SoC.
> + "renesas,can-r8a774a1" if CAN controller is a part of R8A774A1 SoC.
Looks good to me.
> "renesas,can-r8a7778" if CAN controller is a part of R8A7778 SoC.
> "renesas,can-r8a7779" if CAN controller is a part of R8A7779 SoC.
> "renesas,can-r8a7790" if CAN controller is a part of R8A7790 SoC.
> @@ -17,6 +18,7 @@ Required properties:
> "renesas,rcar-gen2-can" for a generic R-Car Gen2 or RZ/G1
> compatible device.
> "renesas,rcar-gen3-can" for a generic R-Car Gen3 compatible device.
> + "renesas,rzg-gen2-can" for a generic RZ/G2 compatible device.
AFAIK, the actual CAN module in RZ/G2M is fully compatible with the CAN
module in R-Car Gen3 SoCs. The lack of clkp2 is merely an integration
difference: as RZ/G2 SoCs do not have the CANFD module, and their CPG block
doesn't provide the CANFD clock (so the CAN device node in DT cannot refer
to that clock anyway).
Hence I don't think there's a need to introduce a "renesas,rzg-gen2-can"
compatible value.
> When compatible with the generic version, nodes must list the
> SoC-specific version corresponding to the platform first
> followed by the generic version.
> @@ -24,7 +26,9 @@ Required properties:
> - reg: physical base address and size of the R-Car CAN register map.
> - interrupts: interrupt specifier for the sole interrupt.
> - clocks: phandles and clock specifiers for 3 CAN clock inputs.
You still have "3" here. Perhaps
"Must contain a phandle and clock-specifier pair for each entry in
clock-names."?
> -- clock-names: 3 clock input name strings: "clkp1", "clkp2", "can_clk".
> +- clock-names: 2 clock input name strings for RZ/G2: "clkp1", "can_clk".
> + 3 clock input name strings for every other SoC: "clkp1", "clkp2",
> + "can_clk".
OK.
> @@ -41,8 +45,9 @@ using the below properties:
> Optional properties:
> - renesas,can-clock-select: R-Car CAN Clock Source Select. Valid values are:
> <0x0> (default) : Peripheral clock (clkp1)
> - <0x1> : Peripheral clock (clkp2)
> - <0x3> : Externally input clock
> + <0x1> : Peripheral clock (clkp2) (not supported by
> + RZ/G2 devices)
> + <0x3> : External input clock
I already expressed my feelings about this property in my reply to the first
patch ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists