[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1675445.itdTWD7r8S@blindfold>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:50:37 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/25] ubifs: add helper functions for authentication support
Am Mittwoch, 4. Juli 2018, 14:41:22 CEST schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> This patch adds the various helper functions needed for authentication
> support. We need functions to hash nodes, to embed HMACs into a node and
> to compare hashes and HMACs. Most functions first check if this
> filesystem is authenticated and bail out early if not, which makes the
> functions safe to be called with disabled authentication.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/Kconfig | 1 +
> fs/ubifs/Makefile | 1 +
> fs/ubifs/auth.c | 413 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/ubifs/ubifs.h | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 602 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 fs/ubifs/auth.c
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> index 83a961bf7280..2a0b5f1134a4 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ config UBIFS_FS
> select CRYPTO if UBIFS_FS_ZLIB
> select CRYPTO_LZO if UBIFS_FS_LZO
> select CRYPTO_DEFLATE if UBIFS_FS_ZLIB
> + select CRYPTO_HASH_INFO
> depends on MTD_UBI
> help
> UBIFS is a file system for flash devices which works on top of UBI.
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Makefile b/fs/ubifs/Makefile
> index 9758f709c736..2bdb8ae2f435 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/Makefile
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/Makefile
> @@ -7,3 +7,4 @@ ubifs-y += budget.o find.o tnc_commit.o compress.o lpt.o lprops.o
> ubifs-y += recovery.o ioctl.o lpt_commit.o tnc_misc.o xattr.o debug.o
> ubifs-y += misc.o
> ubifs-$(CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION) += crypto.o
> +ubifs-$(CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_AUTHENTICATION) += auth.o
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/auth.c b/fs/ubifs/auth.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fd21f2ec8734
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/auth.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,413 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * This file is part of UBIFS.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Pengutronix, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * This file implements various helper functions for UBIFS authentication support
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/crypto.h>
> +#include <crypto/hash.h>
> +#include <crypto/sha.h>
> +#include <crypto/algapi.h>
> +#include <keys/user-type.h>
> +
> +#include "ubifs.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * ubifs_node_calc_hash - calculate the hash of a UBIFS node
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + * @node: the node to calculate a hash for
> + * @hash: the returned hash
> + */
> +void __ubifs_node_calc_hash(const struct ubifs_info *c, const void *node,
> + u8 *hash)
> +{
> + const struct ubifs_ch *ch = node;
> + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, c->hash_tfm);
> +
> + shash->tfm = c->hash_tfm;
> + shash->flags = CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP;
> +
> + crypto_shash_digest(shash, node, le32_to_cpu(ch->len), hash);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ubifs_hash_calc_hmac - calculate a HMAC from a hash
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + * @hash: the node to calculate a HMAC for
> + * @hmac: the returned HMAC
> + */
> +static void ubifs_hash_calc_hmac(const struct ubifs_info *c, const u8 *hash,
> + u8 *hmac)
> +{
> + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, c->hmac_tfm);
> +
> + shash->tfm = c->hmac_tfm;
> + shash->flags = CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP;
> +
> + crypto_shash_digest(shash, hash, c->hash_len, hmac);
Crypto functions can fail, you need to check the return value.
(Please check also other call sites)
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ubifs_prepare_auth_node - Prepare an authentication node
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + * @node: the node to calculate a hash for
> + * @hash: input hash of previous nodes
> + *
> + * This function prepares an authentication node for writing onto flash.
> + * It creates a HMAC from the given input hash and writes it to the node.
> + */
> +void ubifs_prepare_auth_node(struct ubifs_info *c, void *node,
> + struct shash_desc *inhash)
> +{
> + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(hash_desc, c->hash_tfm);
> + struct ubifs_auth_node *auth = node;
> + u8 hash[crypto_shash_descsize(c->hash_tfm)];
Doesn't this introduce a new VLA?
Not that me make Kees unhappy. ;-)
> + hash_desc->tfm = c->hash_tfm;
> + hash_desc->flags = CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP;
> + ubifs_shash_copy_state(c, inhash, hash_desc);
> + crypto_shash_final(hash_desc, hash);
> +
> + ubifs_hash_calc_hmac(c, hash, auth->hmac);
> +
> + auth->ch.node_type = UBIFS_AUTH_NODE;
> + ubifs_prepare_node(c, auth, ubifs_auth_node_sz(c), 0);
> +}
> +
> +static struct shash_desc *ubifs_get_desc(const struct ubifs_info *c,
> + struct crypto_shash *tfm)
> +{
> + struct shash_desc *desc;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!ubifs_authenticated(c))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + desc = kmalloc(sizeof(*desc) + crypto_shash_descsize(tfm), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!desc)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + desc->tfm = tfm;
> + desc->flags = CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP;
> +
> + err = crypto_shash_init(desc);
> + if (err) {
> + kfree(desc);
> + return ERR_PTR(err);
> + }
> +
> + return desc;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __ubifs_hash_get_desc - get a descriptor suitable for hashing a node
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + *
> + * This function returns a descriptor suitable for hashing a node. Free after use
> + * with kfree.
> + */
> +struct shash_desc *__ubifs_hash_get_desc(const struct ubifs_info *c)
> +{
> + return ubifs_get_desc(c, c->hash_tfm);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __ubifs_shash_final - finalize shash
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + * @desc: the descriptor
> + * @out: the output hash
> + *
> + * Simple wrapper around crypto_shash_final(), safe to be called with
> + * disabled authentication.
> + */
> +int __ubifs_shash_final(const struct ubifs_info *c, struct shash_desc *desc,
> + u8 *out)
> +{
> + if (ubifs_authenticated(c))
> + return crypto_shash_final(desc, out);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __ubifs_node_check_hash - check the hash of a node against given hash
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + * @node: the node
> + * @expected: the expected hash
> + *
> + * This function calculates a hash over a node and compares it to the given hash.
> + * Returns 0 if both hashes are equal or authentication is disabled, otherwise a
> + * negative error code is returned.
> + */
> +int __ubifs_node_check_hash(const struct ubifs_info *c, void *node,
> + const u8 *expected)
> +{
> + u8 calc[UBIFS_MAX_HASH_LEN];
> +
> + __ubifs_node_calc_hash(c, node, calc);
> +
> + if (ubifs_check_hash(c, expected, calc))
> + return -EPERM;
Not sure if this action isn't a little too weak.
If a node's hash is not valid we are already in deep trouble and I'm not sure
whether it makes sense to trust the filesystem at all anymore.
But that's in general something I need to sort out with VFS/fscrypt folks.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ubifs_init_authentication - initialize UBIFS authentication support
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + *
> + * This function returns 0 for success or a negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int ubifs_init_authentication(struct ubifs_info *c)
> +{
> + struct key *keyring_key;
> + const struct user_key_payload *ukp;
> + int err;
> + char hmac_name[CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME];
> +
> + if (!c->auth_hash_name) {
> + ubifs_err(c, "authentication hash name needed with authentication");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + c->auth_hash_algo = match_string(hash_algo_name, HASH_ALGO__LAST,
> + c->auth_hash_name);
> + if ((int)c->auth_hash_algo < 0) {
> + ubifs_err(c, "Unknown hash algo %s specified",
> + c->auth_hash_name);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + snprintf(hmac_name, CRYPTO_MAX_ALG_NAME, "hmac(%s)",
> + c->auth_hash_name);
> +
> + keyring_key = request_key(&key_type_logon, c->auth_key_name, NULL);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(keyring_key)) {
> + ubifs_err(c, "Failed to request key: %ld",
> + PTR_ERR(keyring_key));
> + return PTR_ERR(keyring_key);
> + }
> +
> + down_read(&keyring_key->sem);
> +
> + if (keyring_key->type != &key_type_logon) {
> + ubifs_err(c, "key type must be logon");
> + err = -ENOKEY;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ukp = user_key_payload_locked(keyring_key);
> + if (!ukp) {
> + /* key was revoked before we acquired its semaphore */
> + err = -EKEYREVOKED;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + c->hash_tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(c->auth_hash_name, 0,
> + CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC);
> + if (IS_ERR(c->hash_tfm)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(c->hash_tfm);
> + ubifs_err(c, "Can not allocate %s: %d",
> + c->auth_hash_name, err);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + c->hash_len = crypto_shash_digestsize(c->hash_tfm);
> + if (c->hash_len > UBIFS_MAX_HASH_LEN) {
> + ubifs_err(c, "hash %s is bigger than maximum allowed hash size (%d > %d)",
> + c->auth_hash_name, c->hash_len, UBIFS_MAX_HASH_LEN);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free_hash;
> + }
> +
> + c->hmac_tfm = crypto_alloc_shash(hmac_name, 0, CRYPTO_ALG_ASYNC);
> + if (IS_ERR(c->hmac_tfm)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(c->hmac_tfm);
> + ubifs_err(c, "Can not allocate %s: %d", hmac_name, err);
> + goto out_free_hash;
> + }
> +
> + c->hmac_desc_len = crypto_shash_digestsize(c->hmac_tfm);
> + if (c->hmac_desc_len > UBIFS_MAX_HMAC_LEN) {
> + ubifs_err(c, "hmac %s is bigger than maximum allowed hmac size (%d > %d)",
> + hmac_name, c->hmac_desc_len, UBIFS_MAX_HMAC_LEN);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free_hash;
> + }
> +
> + err = crypto_shash_setkey(c->hmac_tfm, ukp->data, ukp->datalen);
> + if (err)
> + goto out_free_hmac;
> +
> + c->authenticated = true;
> +
> + c->log_hash = ubifs_hash_get_desc(c);
> + if (IS_ERR(c->log_hash))
> + goto out_free_hmac;
> +
> + err = 0;
> +
> +out_free_hmac:
> + if (err)
> + crypto_free_shash(c->hmac_tfm);
> +out_free_hash:
> + if (err)
> + crypto_free_shash(c->hash_tfm);
> +out:
> + up_read(&keyring_key->sem);
> + key_put(keyring_key);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __ubifs_exit_authentication - release resource
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + *
> + * This function releases the authentication related resources.
> + */
> +void __ubifs_exit_authentication(struct ubifs_info *c)
> +{
> + if (!ubifs_authenticated(c))
> + return;
> +
> + crypto_free_shash(c->hmac_tfm);
> + crypto_free_shash(c->hash_tfm);
> + kfree(c->log_hash);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ubifs_node_calc_hmac - calculate the HMAC of a UBIFS node
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + * @node: the node to insert a HMAC into.
> + * @len: the length of the node
> + * @ofs_hmac: the offset in the node where the HMAC is inserted
> + * @hmac: returned HMAC
> + *
> + * This function calculates a HMAC of a UBIFS node. The HMAC is expected to be
> + * embedded into the node, so this area is not covered by the HMAC. Also not
> + * covered is the UBIFS_NODE_MAGIC and the CRC of the node.
> + */
> +static void ubifs_node_calc_hmac(const struct ubifs_info *c, const void *node,
> + int len, int ofs_hmac, void *hmac)
> +{
> + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, c->hmac_tfm);
> + int hmac_len = c->hmac_desc_len;
> +
> + ubifs_assert(ofs_hmac > 8);
> + ubifs_assert(ofs_hmac + hmac_len < len);
> +
> + shash->tfm = c->hmac_tfm;
> + shash->flags = CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP;
> +
> + crypto_shash_init(shash);
> +
> + /* behind common node header CRC up to HMAC begin */
> + crypto_shash_update(shash, node + 8, ofs_hmac - 8);
> +
> + /* behind HMAC, if any */
> + if (len - ofs_hmac - hmac_len > 0)
> + crypto_shash_update(shash, node + ofs_hmac + hmac_len,
> + len - ofs_hmac - hmac_len);
> +
> + crypto_shash_final(shash, hmac);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __ubifs_node_insert_hmac - insert a HMAC into a UBIFS node
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + * @node: the node to insert a HMAC into.
> + * @len: the length of the node
> + * @ofs_hmac: the offset in the node where the HMAC is inserted
> + *
> + * This function inserts a HMAC at offset @ofs_hmac into the node given in
> + * @node.
> + */
> +void __ubifs_node_insert_hmac(const struct ubifs_info *c, void *node, int len,
> + int ofs_hmac)
> +{
> + ubifs_node_calc_hmac(c, node, len, ofs_hmac, node + ofs_hmac);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __ubifs_node_verify_hmac - verify the HMAC of UBIFS node
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + * @node: the node to insert a HMAC into.
> + * @len: the length of the node
> + * @ofs_hmac: the offset in the node where the HMAC is inserted
> + *
> + * This function verifies the HMAC at offset @ofs_hmac of the node given in
> + * @node. Returns 0 if successful or a negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int __ubifs_node_verify_hmac(const struct ubifs_info *c, const void *node,
> + int len, int ofs_hmac)
> +{
> + int hmac_len = c->hmac_desc_len;
> + u8 *hmac;
> + int err;
> +
> + hmac = kmalloc(hmac_len, GFP_NOFS);
> + if (!hmac)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ubifs_node_calc_hmac(c, node, len, ofs_hmac, hmac);
> +
> + err = crypto_memneq(hmac, node + ofs_hmac, hmac_len);
> +
> + kfree(hmac);
> +
> + if (!err)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return -EPERM;
Same.
> +}
> +
> +int __ubifs_shash_copy_state(const struct ubifs_info *c, struct shash_desc *src,
> + struct shash_desc *target)
> +{
> + u8 state[crypto_shash_descsize(src->tfm)];
> + int err;
> +
> + err = crypto_shash_export(src, state);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return crypto_shash_import(target, state);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ubifs_hmac_wkm - Create a HMAC of the well known message
> + * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
> + * @hmac: The HMAC of the well known message
> + *
> + * This function creates a HMAC of a well known message. This is used
> + * to check if the provided key is suitable to authenticate a UBIFS
> + * image. This is only a convenience to the user to provide a better
> + * error message when the wrong key is provided.
> + */
> +void ubifs_hmac_wkm(struct ubifs_info *c, u8 *hmac)
> +{
> + SHASH_DESC_ON_STACK(shash, c->hmac_tfm);
> + int err;
> + const char well_known_message[] = "UBIFS";
> +
> + if (!ubifs_authenticated(c))
> + return;
> +
> + shash->tfm = c->hmac_tfm;
> + shash->flags = CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP;
> +
> + err = crypto_shash_init(shash);
> + BUG_ON(err);
Huh? Do we really have to shoot the kernel in the head here?
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists