linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: sched: Fix memory exposure from short TCA_U32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180827023526.GA6515@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 27 Aug 2018 03:35:26 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sched: Fix memory exposure from short TCA_U32_SEL

On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 10:00:46PM -0400, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 03:26:54PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2018-08-26 at 22:24 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 11:57:57AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > That, BTW, is why I hate the use of sizeof(*p) in kmalloc, etc.
> > > > > > arguments.  typeof is even worse in that respect.
> > > > >
> > > > > True.  Semantic searches via tools like coccinelle could help here
> > > > > but those searches are quite a bit slower than straightforward greps.
> > > >
> > > > Those searches are .config-sensitive as well, which can be much more
> > > > unpleasant than being slow...
> > >
> > > Are they?  Julia?
> >
> > They work pretty much on preprocessor output level; if something it ifdef'ed
> > out on given config, it won't be seen...
> 
> Coccinelle doesn't care what is ifdef'd out.  It only misses the things it
> can't parse.  Very strange ifdefs could indeed cause that, but it should
> be a minor problem.

OK, but... what does it do when it sees two definitions of a structure
in different branches of #if/#else/#endif?  I think I'm confused about
what it can and cannot do; to restate the original problem:
	* we need to find all places where instances of given type
are created.  Assume it never is a member of struct/union/array and
no static or auto duration instances exist - everything is dynamically
allocated somewhere.

Can coccinelle do that and if it can, what are the limitations?