[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5905126e70b0ed1781e49265fd5c49c5090d0223.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:15:20 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>, apw@...onical.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add optional static const to blank line
declarations test
Using a static const struct definition as part of
a series of declarations produces a false positive
"Missing a blank line after declarations" for code like:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
#710: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_scale_coefs.c:137:
+ int inc;
+ static const struct {
So fix it.
Reported-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@...com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 5219280bf7ff..b4caee6e269c 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3311,7 +3311,7 @@ sub process {
# known declaration macros
$sline =~ /^\+\s+$declaration_macros/ ||
# start of struct or union or enum
- $sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ ||
+ $sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:static\s+)?(?:const\s+)?(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ ||
# start or end of block or continuation of declaration
$sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:$|[\{\}\.\#\"\?\:\(\[])/ ||
# bitfield continuation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists