lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:42:42 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Removing entry trampoline and associated reversions

[gah -- accidentally hit send]

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> We had an unfortunate conflict.  Adrian did all the plumbing to get
> entry_trampoline to play nicelyh with kcore and perf.  Meanwhile, I
> was working on getting rid of the entry trampoline.  Adrian's code is
> merged and mine is finally in good shape, and there's an obvious
> conflict.
>
> So I did a bunch of reverts, all but one of which were clean.  The
> series is here:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/log/?h=x86/pti
>
> and the messy revert is here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?h=x86/pti&id=50ef6380e448650b48db979d7d1f20a325b0a273

Is this the right approach?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ