[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180827171003.GU160295@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:10:03 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT" <linux-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Siddartha Mohanadoss <smohanad@...eaurora.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: pm8998: Add adc node
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 05:09:17PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org> wrote:
> > This adds the adc node to pm8998 based on the examples in the
> > bindings. It also fixes the order of the included headers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> > index 92bed1e7d4bb..f70f6101bceb 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8998.dtsi
> > @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> > /* Copyright 2018 Google LLC. */
> >
> > -#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/spmi/spmi.h>
> >
> > &spmi_bus {
> > pm8998_lsid0: pmic@0 {
> > @@ -11,6 +12,16 @@
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > + pm8998_adc: adc@...0 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc-rev2";
> > + reg = <0x3100>;
> > + interrupts = <0x0 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> > + io-channel-ranges;
> > + };
>
> I'm a little confused about what the "io-channel-ranges" does here.
> The documentation isn't clear at all to me for it. If I'm reading it
> right it's also supposed to be for iio-consumers, but you're using it
> in a provider. I see you copied this from the example. Maybe the
> example is wrong? ...or I'm just confused...
Yes, I copied it from the example, its use here is also not clear to
me, other ADC providers like adc@...c0000 in exynos3250.dtsi or
adc@...a6000 in bcm-cygnus.dtsi also specify it ...
Siddartha/Jonathan, could you help to clarify if "io-channel-ranges"
should really be specified here as the DT example suggests?
Thanks
Matthias
Powered by blists - more mailing lists