[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153540448713.129321.8622050618939041593@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:14:47 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robh@...nel.org, Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: Introduce QCOM LPASS clock bindings
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-08-03 05:21:13)
> Add device tree bindings for Low Power Audio subsystem clock controller for
> Qualcomm Technology Inc's SDM845 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt | 2 ++
> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lpasscc.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdm845.h | 2 ++
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,lpass-sdm845.h | 16 +++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lpasscc.txt
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,lpass-sdm845.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt
> index 664ea1f..e452abc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ be part of GCC and hence the TSENS properties can also be
> part of the GCC/clock-controller node.
> For more details on the TSENS properties please refer
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.txt
> +- qcom,lpass-protected : Indicate GCC to be able to access the
> + lpass gcc clock branches.
This doesn't parse well for me. Maybe something like:
'Indicate that the LPASS clock branches within GCC are unusable due to
firmware access control restrictions'?
>
> Example:
> clock-controller@...000 {
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lpasscc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lpasscc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..062e413
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,lpasscc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +Qualcomm LPASS Clock Controller Binding
> +-----------------------------------------------
> +
> +Required properties :
> +- compatible : shall contain "qcom,sdm845-lpasscc"
> +- #clock-cells : from common clock binding, shall contain 1.
> +- reg : shall contain base register address and size,
> + in the order
> + Index-0 maps to LPASS_CC register region
> + Index-1 maps to LPASS_QDSP6SS register region
> +- qcom,lpass-protected : Boolean property to indicate to GCC clock controller
> + for the lpass GCC clocks.
Why is this here?
> +
> +Optional properties :
> +- reg-names : register names of LPASS domain
> + "lpass_cc", "lpass_qdsp6ss".
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +The below node has to be defined in the cases where the LPASS peripheral loader
> +would bring the subsystem out of reset.
> +
> + lpasscc: clock-controller {
> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-lpasscc";
> + reg = <0x17014000 0x1f004>, <0x17300000 0x200>;
> + reg-names = "lpass_cc", "lpass_qdsp6ss";
> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + gcc: clock-controller@...000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,gcc-sdm845";
> + qcom,lpass-protected;
> + };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists