[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180828124358.13c711e4@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:43:58 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: new maintainer/tree for the libata tree?
Hi Jens,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:30:09 -0600 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> On 8/27/18 7:28 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 19:15:23 -0600 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/27/18 3:20 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I noticed the maintaership change - so what shuld I sues for linux-next,
> >>> now?
> >>>
> >>> I currently have
> >>>
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata.git#for-next
> >>
> >> I'll merge into my for-next branch on the block tree, I'm don't plan on
> >> doing separate trees for this, just separate branches. And everything I
> >> queue up for the next version will end up in my for-next branch.
> >
> > So I'll just drop the libata tree from linux-next, then?
>
> Yeah, that should be all that's needed.
Done.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists