[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180828071723.GA15508@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:17:23 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"npmccallum@...hat.com" <npmccallum@...hat.com>,
"linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 02/13] x86/cpufeature: Add SGX and SGX_LC CPU features
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:07:41AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> > +#define X86_FEATURE_SGX_LC (16*32+30) /* supports SGX launch
> > configuration */
>
> Sorry if it was me who wrote the comment "SGX launch configuration". I
> think we should just use "SGX launch control". :)
Not sure if we should change though. The former is more self-explaining,
the latter is "more official".
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists