lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iJbC4=rBd3RNvS+i0m6ef66c6W9bv=TK2wmiEdVkJ6M6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:36:37 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     wen.yang99@....com.cn
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jiang.biao2@....com.cn,
        zhong.weidong@....com.cn, liu.bo9@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: another fix of uncloning packets before mangling them

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:32 AM Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn> wrote:
>
> The following warning was caught:
>
> [937151.638394] Call Trace:
> [937151.638401]  [<ffffffff8163f2f6>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> [937151.638405]  [<ffffffff8107dd70>] warn_slowpath_common+0x70/0xb0
> [937151.638407]  [<ffffffff8107deba>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [937151.638410]  [<ffffffff8158bb7b>] tcp_set_skb_tso_segs+0xeb/0x100
> [937151.638412]  [<ffffffff8158bbc7>] tcp_init_tso_segs+0x37/0x50
> [937151.638414]  [<ffffffff8158d7b9>] tcp_write_xmit+0x1d9/0xce0
> [937151.638417]  [<ffffffff8158e53e>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x2e/0xc0
> [937151.638419]  [<ffffffff8157cf3c>] tcp_push+0xec/0x120
> [937151.638421]  [<ffffffff81580728>] tcp_sendmsg+0xc8/0xc20
> [937151.638424]  [<ffffffff815aae24>] inet_sendmsg+0x64/0xb0
> [937151.638428]  [<ffffffff810b9565>] ? check_preempt_curr+0x75/0xa0
> [937151.638434]  [<ffffffff81519917>] sock_aio_write+0x157/0x180
> [937151.638437]  [<ffffffff811e267d>] do_sync_write+0x8d/0xd0
> [937151.638440]  [<ffffffff811e2f95>] vfs_write+0x1b5/0x1e0
> [937151.638442]  [<ffffffff811e393f>] SyS_write+0x7f/0xe0
> [937151.638445]  [<ffffffff816513fd>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>
> According commit c52e2421f736 ("tcp: must unclone packets before
> mangling them"), TCP stack should make sure it owns skbs before
> mangling them.
> And there is another place where skb_unclone() is needed. This patch
> fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@....com.cn>
> Tested-by: Liu Bo <liu.bo9@....com.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Jiang Biao <jiang.biao2@....com.cn>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> index 597dbd7..fbe8140 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
> @@ -1793,6 +1793,9 @@ static int tcp_init_tso_segs(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int mss_now)
>         int tso_segs = tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
>

Certainly not needed.

TCP stack owns its packets, as long they were never sent (not yet in
retransmit queue)

You probably are using an old kernel, missing some backport...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ