[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd2B47bMHOuDtFcRUbbMXekgxsG+WP5kj-E1Z_K09=C4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:57:43 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
timur@...nel.org, nicoleotsuka@...il.com, Xiubo.Lee@...il.com,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, olivier.moysan@...com,
arnaud.pouliquen@...com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC PA SEMI PWRFICIENT"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 4:57 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node,
> convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
> + snprintf((char *)dai->platform_name, DAI_NAME_SIZE, "%llx.%pOFn",
> + (unsigned long long) res.start, dma_channel_np);
I understand that is not the part of the change, but wouldn't be good
to replace that ugly casting with proper specifier as well?
I mean
%pa ... &res.start
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%pOFn sync own reference\n",
> + np);
One line?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists