[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180828085703.GG23727@krava>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:57:03 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2]: perf record: enable asynchronous trace writing
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 09:16:55PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
SNIP
> + int trace_fd = rec->session->data->file.fd;
> + struct aiocb **mmap_aio = rec->evlist->mmap_aio;
> + int mmap_aio_size = 0;
> + off_t off;
>
> if (!evlist)
> return 0;
> @@ -528,14 +632,17 @@ static int record__mmap_read_evlist(struct record *rec, struct perf_evlist *evli
> if (overwrite && evlist->bkw_mmap_state != BKW_MMAP_DATA_PENDING)
> return 0;
>
> + off = lseek(trace_fd, 0, SEEK_CUR);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < evlist->nr_mmaps; i++) {
> struct auxtrace_mmap *mm = &maps[i].auxtrace_mmap;
>
> if (maps[i].base) {
> - if (perf_mmap__push(&maps[i], rec, record__pushfn) != 0) {
> - rc = -1;
> + rc = perf_mmap__push(&maps[i], rec, record__pushfn, &off);
> + if (rc < 0)
> goto out;
> - }
> + else if (rc > 0)
> + mmap_aio[mmap_aio_size++] = &maps[i].cblock;
I understand the purpose of mmap_aio array, but I don't see a reason
to fill it in every time we call record__mmap_read_evlist
the way I see it, when 'pushing the data' it's either all or nothing,
if there's an error in pushing one map, we bail out completely..
so the mmap_aio array could be preallocated (it is now) and
pre-filled with cblock pointers
that would probably ease up the reference counting I mentioned
in the previous email
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists