linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] EDAC: Remove the i82443bxgx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180828085903.GA32231@nazgul.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:59:03 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Tim Small <tim@...tersideup.com>
Cc:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: Remove the i82443bxgx_edac driver

On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:30:23PM +0100, Tim Small wrote:
> On that basis, I don't see a problem with removing it, but if there's a
> preference for me to fix it, (and if I still have some old hardware
> somewhere that I can test it on), I'll be happy to do that instead.

Well, if you don't have the hardware anymore, fixing it would be moot
and the only thing we can do is remove it. So, the question is, do you
still have a functioning box and you want to waste your time with it?

I mean, this is pentium III, it probably takes forever to build the
latest kernel on it and if it were me, I'd simply buy new hardware.
Because IMO, it is not worth the energy to even power such ancient crap
and waste money on the electricity it is going to consume...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--