[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58fd7ab3-c115-1f26-6d6e-677af6351239@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:20:31 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Alban <albeu@...e.fr>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Naren <naren.kernel@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
Sven Van Asbroeck <svendev@...x.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/29] mtd: Add support for reading MTD devices via the
nvmem API
On 23/08/18 11:29, Alban wrote:
> Let say I have a device that use the following binding:
>
> device {
> compatible = "example-device";
> #address-cells = <2>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
>
> child@0,0 {
> reg = <0x0 0x0>;
> ...
> };
>
> child@1,2 {
> reg = <0x1 0x2>;
> ...
> };
>
> };
>
> Now this binding already use the node address space for something,
> so putting a nvmem node as direct child would not work.
AFAIK, It should work but the we would get a DT warning this, as nvmem
does not use of_address based apis to parse this. Which should be
totally fixed!!
As discussed before once we add support to #address-cells and
#size-cells in nvmem core this should not be a problem.
--srini
Here it is
> quiet clear as we have 2 address cells, however even if the number of
> cells and the cells size would match it would still be conceptually
> wrong as both bindings then use the same address space for something
> different.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists