[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1Vdy-VsLWJMer-Z96E4Trhi0WJXJ3fTzyOGny2Mn6RAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 14:08:55 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: sunil.kovvuri@...il.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, gakula@...vell.com,
sgoutham@...vell.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] soc: octeontx2: Reconfig MSIX base with IOVA
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:58 PM <sunil.kovvuri@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>
>
> HW interprets RVU_AF_MSIXTR_BASE address as an IOVA, hence
> create a IOMMU mapping for the physcial address configured by
> firmware and reconfig RVU_AF_MSIXTR_BASE with IOVA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
I think this needs some more explanation. What is the difference between
the MSI-X support in this driver and every other one? Are you working
around a hardware bug, or is there something odd in the implementation
of your irqchip driver? Do you use a GIC to handle the MSI interrupts
or something else?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists