linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2]: perf: reduce data loss when profiling highly parallel CPU bound workloads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7451edc-8261-a75d-226c-c8d419c5a8b4@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Aug 2018 17:17:42 +0300
From:   Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2]: perf: reduce data loss when profiling highly
 parallel CPU bound workloads

Hi,

On 28.08.2018 14:58, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> On 28.08.2018 11:59, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:03:21PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>>>
>>> Currently in record mode the tool implements trace writing serially. 
>>> The algorithm loops over mapped per-cpu data buffers and stores ready 
>>> data chunks into a trace file using write() system call.
>>>
>>> At some circumstances the kernel may lack free space in a buffer 
>>> because the other buffer's half is not yet written to disk due to 
>>> some other buffer's data writing by the tool at the moment.
>>>
>>> Thus serial trace writing implementation may cause the kernel 
>>> to loose profiling data and that is what observed when profiling 
>>> highly parallel CPU bound workloads on machines with big number 
>>> of cores.
>>>
>>> Experiment with profiling matrix multiplication code executing 128 
>>> threads on Intel Xeon Phi (KNM) with 272 cores, like below,
>>> demonstrates data loss metrics value of 98%:
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/time perf record -o /tmp/perf-ser.data -a -N -B -T -R -g \
>>>     --call-graph dwarf,1024 --user-regs=IP,SP,BP \
>>>     --switch-events -e cycles,instructions,ref-cycles,software/period=1,name=cs,config=0x3/Duk -- \
>>>     matrix.gcc
>>>
>>> Data loss metrics is the ratio lost_time/elapsed_time where 
>>> lost_time is the sum of time intervals containing PERF_RECORD_LOST 
>>> records and elapsed_time is the elapsed application run time 
>>> under profiling.
>>
>> I like the idea and I think it's good direction to go, but could
>> you please share some from perf stat or whatever you used to meassure
>> the new performance?
> 
> Is it ok to share VTune GUI screenshots I sent you the last time 
> to demonstrate the advantage of AIO trace streaming?

VTune release manager permitted to share it, well, sorry for bothering.

> 
> Thanks,
> Alexey
> 
> 
>>
>> thanks,
>> jirka
>>
>