Message-ID: <20180828100401.223c02f8@jacob-builder>
Date:   Tue, 28 Aug 2018 10:04:01 -0700
From:   Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
        "Liu@...l.linuxfoundation.org" <Liu@...l.linuxfoundation.org>,
        Yi L <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
        "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/23] iommu: introduce bind_pasid_table API function

On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:20:08 +0200
Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com> wrote:

> Hi Yi Liu,
> 
> On 08/24/2018 02:47 PM, Liu, Yi L wrote:
> > Hi Eric,
> >   
> >> From: iommu-bounces@...ts.linux-foundation.org [mailto:iommu-
> >> bounces@...ts.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Auger Eric
> >> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 12:35 AM
> >>
> >> Hi Jacob,
> >>
> >> On 05/11/2018 10:53 PM, Jacob Pan wrote:  
> >>> Virtual IOMMU was proposed to support Shared Virtual Memory (SVM)
> >>> use in the guest:
> >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-11/msg05311.html
> >>>
> >>> As part of the proposed architecture, when an SVM capable PCI
> >>> device is assigned to a guest, nested mode is turned on. Guest
> >>> owns the first level page tables (request with PASID) which
> >>> performs GVA->GPA translation. Second level page tables are owned
> >>> by the host for GPA->HPA translation for both request with and
> >>> without PASID.
> >>>
> >>> A new IOMMU driver interface is therefore needed to perform tasks
> >>> as follows:
> >>> * Enable nested translation and appropriate translation type
> >>> * Assign guest PASID table pointer (in GPA) and size to host IOMMU
> >>>
> >>> This patch introduces new API functions to perform bind/unbind
> >>> guest PASID tables. Based on common data, model specific IOMMU
> >>> drivers can be extended to perform the specific steps for binding
> >>> pasid table of assigned devices.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker
> >>> <jean-philippe.brucker@....com> Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L
> >>> <yi.l.liu@...ux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj
> >>> <ashok.raj@...el.com> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan
> >>> <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com> ---  
> > 
> > [...]
> >   
> >>> +#ifndef _UAPI_IOMMU_H
> >>> +#define _UAPI_IOMMU_H
> >>> +
> >>> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >>> +
> >>> +/**
> >>> + * PASID table data used to bind guest PASID table to the host
> >>> IOMMU. This will
> >>> + * enable guest managed first level page tables.
> >>> + * @version: for future extensions and identification of the
> >>> data format
> >>> + * @bytes: size of this structure
> >>> + * @base_ptr:	PASID table pointer
> >>> + * @pasid_bits:	number of bits supported in the guest
> >>> PASID table, must be  
> >> less  
> >>> + *		or equal than the host supported PASID size.
> >>> + */
> >>> +struct pasid_table_config {
> >>> +	__u32 version;
> >>> +#define PASID_TABLE_CFG_VERSION_1 1
> >>> +	__u32 bytes;
> >>> +	__u64 base_ptr;
> >>> +	__u8 pasid_bits;  
> >>
> >> As reported in "[RFC 00/13] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup" thread,
> >> this API could be used for ARM SMMUv3 nested stage enablement
> >> without many changes. Assuming SMMUv3 nested stage is confirmed to
> >> be interesting for vendors and maintainers, we could try to unify
> >> the APIs.  
> > 
> > Just a quick question on nested stage on SMMUv3. If virtualizer
> > wants to enable nested stage on SMMUv3, does it link the whole
> > guest CD table to host or do it in other manner?  
> Yes that's correct. On ARM SMMUv3 you have Stream Table Entries (STEs,
> indexed by ReqID=streamid). If stage 1 is used, the STE points to 1 or
> more contiguous Context Descriptors (CDs).
> So STE looks like the VTD Context-Entry and CD table looks like the
> VTD PASID table as far as I understand.
> >   
> >> As far as I understand the VTD PASID table is equivalent to the ARM
> >> SMMUv3 context descriptor table (CD). This corresponds to the
> >> stage 1 context table with one or more entries, each corresponding
> >> to one PASID.  
> > 
> > PASID table is index by PASID, and have multiple entries. A PASID
> > table would have 2^PASID_BITS entries.  
> On ARM SMMUv3 the  number of CDs is 2 ^STE.S1CDMax.
> >   
> >> maybe using the s1ctx_table_config terminology instead of
> >> pasid_table_config would be more generic, the pasid table being
> >> Intel naming.
> >>
> >> on top of pasid_bits, I think an "asid_bits" field may be needed
> >> too. The guest IOMMU might support a different number of asid bits
> >> from the host one.  
> > 
> > Maybe needed for SMMUv3. I've noticed you've placed it in
> > struct iommu_smmu_s1_config.
> >   
> >>
> >> Although without having skimmed through the whole series yet, I
> >> wonder how you handle the case where stage1 is bypassed or
> >> disabled? The guest may define the S1 context entries but bypass
> >> or abort stage 1 translations globally. Looks something missing to
> >> me at first sight.  
> > 
> > Sorry, I didn't quite follow here. What usage is case such for?
> > like stage 1 is bypassed or disabled. IOVA or SVA?  
> Each STE entry has a config field which tells how S1 and S2 behave
> 
> Options are no traffic at all or any combination of the following:
> 
> S1        S2
> bypass    bypass
> transl    bypass
> bypass    transl
> transl    transl
> 
> host manages S2 info. guest sets S1 related fields.
> 
> To me the guest SET.Config should be passed to the host so that this
> latter writes the correct global Config field value in the STE,
> including S1 + S2 info.
> 
Global config ( VT-d global command reg) is IOMMU wide, we cannot let
guest config change to directly modify global settings. I think it is
up to the vIOMMU emulation code to unbind guest PASID table thus
disable S1, if the guest is setting S1 to bypass/disabled.

I am still perplexed by valid use cases of S1 bypass, to me it means no
SVA nor guest IOVA which means no need for vIOMMU.

> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Yi Liu
> >   

[Jacob Pan]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists