Message-ID: <52eb7b5f-a405-06d1-2758-f27401a3ce3b@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Aug 2018 22:25:21 +0200
From:   Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, rteysseyre@...il.com,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] leds: core: Introduce LED pattern trigger

On 08/25/2018 09:51 AM, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 25 August 2018 at 04:44, Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 08/24/2018 10:12 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> On Fri 2018-08-24 21:49:50, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>>
>>>> On 08/24/2018 12:11 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that it would be more flexible if software pattern fallback
>>>>>> was applied in case of pattern_set failure. Otherwise, it would
>>>>>> lead to the situation where LED class devices that support hardware
>>>>>> blinking couldn't be applied the same set of patterns as LED class
>>>>>> devices that don't implement pattern_set. The latter will always have to
>>>>>> resort to using software pattern engine which will accept far greater
>>>>>> amount of pattern combinations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this case we need to discuss on what basis the decision will be
>>>>>> made on whether hardware or software engine will be used.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Possible options coming to mind:
>>>>>> - an interface will be provided to determine max difference between
>>>>>>   the settings supported by the hardware and the settings requested by
>>>>>>   the user, that will result in aligning user's setting to the hardware
>>>>>>   capabilities
>>>>>> - the above alignment rate will be predefined instead
>>>>>> - hardware engine will be used only if user requests supported settings
>>>>>>   on the whole span of the requested pattern
>>>>>> - in each of the above cases it would be worth to think of the
>>>>>>   interface to show the scope of the settings supported by hardware
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd recommend keeping it simple. We use hardware engine if driver
>>>>> author thinks pattern is "close enough".
>>>>
>>>> The thing is that in the ledtrig-pattern v5 implementation there
>>>> is no option of using software fallback if pattern_set op
>>>> is initialized:
>>>>
>>>> +    if (led_cdev->pattern_set) {
>>>> +            return led_cdev->pattern_set(led_cdev, data->patterns,
>>>> +                                         data->npatterns, data->repeat);
>>>> +    }
>>>
>>> Yeah, that sounds wrong. (Sorry I did not pay enough attention).
>>>
>>> It pattern_set() returns special error code, it should just continue
>>> and use software pattern fallback.
>>
>> And now we can get back to the issue I was concerned about in the
>> email you replied to, i.e. what series of [brightness delta_t] tuples
>> should be written to the pattern file to enable hardware breathing
>> engine.
> 
> OK. So now we've made a consensus to use the software pattern fallback
> if failed to set hardware pattern. How about introduce one interface
> to convert hardware patterns to software patterns if necessary?
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c
> b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c
> index 63b94a2..d46a641 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-pattern.c
> @@ -66,8 +66,15 @@ static int pattern_trig_start_pattern(struct
> pattern_trig_data *data,
>                 return 0;
> 
>         if (led_cdev->pattern_set) {
> -               return led_cdev->pattern_set(led_cdev, data->patterns,
> -                                            data->npatterns, data->repeat);
> +               ret = led_cdev->pattern_set(led_cdev, data->patterns,
> +                                           data->npatterns, data->repeat);
> +               if (!ret)
> +                       return 0;
> +
> +               dev_warn(led_cdev->dev, "Failed to set hardware pattern\n");
> +
> +               if (led_cdev->pattern_convert)
> +                       led_cdev->pattern_convert(led_cdev,

I can't see how it could help to assess if hw pattern
engine can launch given pattern, and with what accuracy.

Instead, I propose to add a means for defining whether the pattern
to be set is intended for hardware pattern engine or for software
fallback. It could be either separate sysfs file e.g. hw_pattern,
or a modifier to the pattern written to the pattern file, e,g,

echo "hw 100 2 200 3 100 2" > pattern

hw format expected by given driver would have to be described
in the per-driver ABI documentation. All patterns without
"hw" prefix would enable software pattern engine.

> data->patterns, &data->npatterns);
>         }
> 
>         data->curr = data->patterns;
> @@ -106,8 +113,7 @@ static ssize_t repeat_store(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
>         if (err)
>                 return err;
> 
> -       if (!led_cdev->pattern_set)
> -               del_timer_sync(&data->timer);
> +       del_timer_sync(&data->timer);
> 
>         mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> 
> @@ -161,8 +167,7 @@ static ssize_t pattern_store(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr,
>         struct pattern_trig_data *data = led_cdev->trigger_data;
>         int ccount, cr, offset = 0, err = 0;
> 
> -       if (!led_cdev->pattern_set)
> -               del_timer_sync(&data->timer);
> +       del_timer_sync(&data->timer);
> 
>         mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> 
> @@ -232,9 +237,8 @@ static void pattern_trig_deactivate(struct
> led_classdev *led_cdev)
> 
>         if (led_cdev->pattern_clear)
>                 led_cdev->pattern_clear(led_cdev);
> -       else
> -               del_timer_sync(&data->timer);
> 
> +       del_timer_sync(&data->timer);
>         led_set_brightness(led_cdev, LED_OFF);
>         kfree(data);
>         led_cdev->activated = false;
> diff --git a/include/linux/leds.h b/include/linux/leds.h
> index 74fc2c6..04f3eaf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/leds.h
> +++ b/include/linux/leds.h
> @@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ struct led_classdev {
>                            struct led_pattern *pattern, int len,
>                            unsigned int repeat);
>         int (*pattern_clear)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev);
> +       int (*pattern_convert)(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> +                              struct led_pattern *pattern, int *len);
> 
>         struct device           *dev;
>         const struct attribute_group    **groups;
> 

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

Powered by blists - more mailing lists