linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 30/52] rcu: Remove rsp parameter from __rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180829223854.4055-30-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:38:32 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 30/52] rcu: Remove rsp parameter from __rcu_pending()

There now is only one rcu_state structure in a given build of the Linux
kernel, so there is no need to pass it as a parameter to RCU's functions.
This commit therefore removes the rsp parameter from __rcu_pending(),
and also inlines it into rcu_pending(), removing the for_each_rcu_flavor()
while in the neighborhood..

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 34 ++++++++++------------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 4af227e826a6..e347a6b2984c 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2996,8 +2996,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_sched);
  * callbacks in the list of pending callbacks. Until then, this
  * function may only be called from __kfree_rcu().
  */
-void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
-		    rcu_callback_t func)
+void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
 {
 	__call_rcu(head, func, -1, 1);
 }
@@ -3079,21 +3078,23 @@ void cond_synchronize_sched(unsigned long oldstate)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cond_synchronize_sched);
 
 /*
- * Check to see if there is any immediate RCU-related work to be done
- * by the current CPU, for the specified type of RCU, returning 1 if so.
- * The checks are in order of increasing expense: checks that can be
- * carried out against CPU-local state are performed first.  However,
- * we must check for CPU stalls first, else we might not get a chance.
+ * Check to see if there is any immediate RCU-related work to be done by
+ * the current CPU, for the specified type of RCU, returning 1 if so and
+ * zero otherwise.  The checks are in order of increasing expense: checks
+ * that can be carried out against CPU-local state are performed first.
+ * However, we must check for CPU stalls first, else we might not get
+ * a chance.
  */
-static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
+static int rcu_pending(void)
 {
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
 
 	/* Check for CPU stalls, if enabled. */
 	check_cpu_stall(rdp);
 
 	/* Is this CPU a NO_HZ_FULL CPU that should ignore RCU? */
-	if (rcu_nohz_full_cpu(rsp))
+	if (rcu_nohz_full_cpu(&rcu_state))
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Is the RCU core waiting for a quiescent state from this CPU? */
@@ -3123,21 +3124,6 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * Check to see if there is any immediate RCU-related work to be done
- * by the current CPU, returning 1 if so.  This function is part of the
- * RCU implementation; it is -not- an exported member of the RCU API.
- */
-static int rcu_pending(void)
-{
-	struct rcu_state *rsp;
-
-	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
-		if (__rcu_pending(rsp, this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data)))
-			return 1;
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * Return true if the specified CPU has any callback.  If all_lazy is
  * non-NULL, store an indication of whether all callbacks are lazy.
-- 
2.17.1