linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/52] rcu: Remove rsp parameter from rcu_accelerate_cbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180829223854.4055-17-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:38:19 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/52] rcu: Remove rsp parameter from rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked()

There now is only one rcu_state structure in a given build of the
Linux kernel, so there is no need to pass it as a parameter to RCU's
functions.  This commit therefore removes the rsp parameter from
rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 2c1d457e8cc2..442adb8eedc1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1703,15 +1703,14 @@ static bool rcu_accelerate_cbs(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
  * that a new grace-period request be made, invokes rcu_accelerate_cbs()
  * while holding the leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock.
  */
-static void rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(struct rcu_state *rsp,
-					struct rcu_node *rnp,
+static void rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(struct rcu_node *rnp,
 					struct rcu_data *rdp)
 {
 	unsigned long c;
 	bool needwake;
 
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
-	c = rcu_seq_snap(&rsp->gp_seq);
+	c = rcu_seq_snap(&rcu_state.gp_seq);
 	if (!rdp->gpwrap && ULONG_CMP_GE(rdp->gp_seq_needed, c)) {
 		/* Old request still live, so mark recent callbacks. */
 		(void)rcu_segcblist_accelerate(&rdp->cblist, c);
@@ -2758,7 +2757,7 @@ __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	    rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist)) {
 		local_irq_save(flags);
 		if (!rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL))
-			rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(rsp, rnp, rdp);
+			rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(rnp, rdp);
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
 
@@ -2845,7 +2844,7 @@ static void __call_rcu_core(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
 
 		/* Start a new grace period if one not already started. */
 		if (!rcu_gp_in_progress()) {
-			rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(rsp, rdp->mynode, rdp);
+			rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(rdp->mynode, rdp);
 		} else {
 			/* Give the grace period a kick. */
 			rdp->blimit = LONG_MAX;
-- 
2.17.1