linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/52] rcu: Remove rsp parameter from rcu_dump_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:38:11 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/52] rcu: Remove rsp parameter from rcu_dump_cpu_stacks()

There now is only one rcu_state structure in a given build of the
Linux kernel, so there is no need to pass it as a parameter to RCU's
functions.  This commit therefore removes the rsp parameter from
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 0f419554122a..2741d987e745 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1269,13 +1269,13 @@ static void rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation(void)
  * that don't support NMI-based stack dumps.  The NMI-triggered stack
  * traces are more accurate because they are printed by the target CPU.
  */
-static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(struct rcu_state *rsp)
+static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 
-	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp) {
+	rcu_for_each_leaf_node(&rcu_state, rnp) {
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 		for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
 			if (rnp->qsmask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu))
@@ -1354,7 +1354,7 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long gp_seq)
 	       smp_processor_id(), (long)(jiffies - rsp->gp_start),
 	       (long)rcu_seq_current(&rsp->gp_seq), totqlen);
 	if (ndetected) {
-		rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(rsp);
+		rcu_dump_cpu_stacks();
 
 		/* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */
 		rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp);
@@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ static void print_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 
 	rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation();
 
-	rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(rsp);
+	rcu_dump_cpu_stacks();
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 	/* Rewrite if needed in case of slow consoles. */
-- 
2.17.1