linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tiny.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180829225405.7275-17-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:53:58 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/24] rcu: Clean up flavor-related definitions and comments in tiny.c

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tiny.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
index 30826fb6e438..a77853b73bfe 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tiny.c
@@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused
 
 /*
  * Wait for a grace period to elapse.  But it is illegal to invoke
- * synchronize_sched() from within an RCU read-side critical section.
- * Therefore, any legal call to synchronize_sched() is a quiescent
- * state, and so on a UP system, synchronize_sched() need do nothing.
+ * synchronize_rcu() from within an RCU read-side critical section.
+ * Therefore, any legal call to synchronize_rcu() is a quiescent
+ * state, and so on a UP system, synchronize_rcu() need do nothing.
  * (But Lai Jiangshan points out the benefits of doing might_sleep()
  * to reduce latency.)
  *
@@ -130,12 +130,12 @@ void synchronize_rcu(void)
 	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
 			 lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
 			 lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
-			 "Illegal synchronize_sched() in RCU read-side critical section");
+			 "Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
 
 /*
- * Post an RCU callback to be invoked after the end of an RCU-sched grace
+ * Post an RCU callback to be invoked after the end of an RCU grace
  * period.  But since we have but one CPU, that would be after any
  * quiescent state.
  */
-- 
2.17.1