[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180829230715.GA9431@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 16:07:15 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] Dyntick changes for v4.20/v5.0
Hello!
Now that there is only one rcu_data structure per CPU, there isn't a whole
lot of point in maintaining a separate per-CPU rcu_dynticks structure.
This series therefore merges the rcu_dynticks structure into the rcu_data
structure.
1. Remove unused rcu_dynticks_snap() from Tiny RCU.
2. Merge rcu_dynticks structure into rcu_data structure, but
continue using the rcu_dynticks structure's fields.
3-8. Change the code to use the fields in the rcu_data structure
instead of those in the rcu_dynticks structure.
9. Remove the now-obsolete ->dynticks_fqs and ->cond_resched_completed
fields from the rcu_data structure.
10. Convert rcu_state.ofl_lock to raw_spinlock_t to make -rt feel
better, courtesy of Mike Galbraith.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
include/linux/rcutiny.h | 6 -
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 196 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 82 +++++++------------
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 8 -
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 69 +++++++---------
5 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists