lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:35:38 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     sravanhome@...il.com
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, pn@...x.de,
        mp-cs@...ions-semi.com, Jeff Chen <jeff.chen@...ions-semi.com>,
        "Thomas C. Liau" <thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com>,
        linux@...ietech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add Actions Semi S700 pinctrl support

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:48 PM Saravanan Sekar <sravanhome@...il.com> wrote:

> This patchset adds pinctrl support for Actions Semi S700 SoC.
> Pinmux functions are only accessible for pin groups while pinconf
> parameters are available for both pin groups and individual pins.
>
> pinctrl driver is verified using the Cubieboard7.
>
> common functionalities from s900 is moved for all Actions Semi
> SoC's usage.
> Common pad control configurations are moved to SoC specific
>
> dts entry for pinctrl depends on clock driver which is still under review:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10533959/

So what is the status of this patch set?

I am happy to apply it once you have the right buildtime dependencies
and Manivannan's ACK on the patch set! (Looks good to me.)

Maybe you want to rebase on v4.19-rc1 and resend as v5 before
I do that though?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ