linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM lines per GPIO chip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkda2qXxyEj+y8DaZ-_PWcj3pBGtvVAac8qaFCnC0LTNkNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:54:04 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     aditya@...ol.io,
        "thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        gauthier@...ol.io, Alban Browaeys <alban.browaeys@...il.com>,
        linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dennis@...il.us, Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] gpio: mvebu: Add support for multiple PWM
 lines per GPIO chip

On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:31 AM Aditya Prayoga <aditya@...ol.io> wrote:

> Allow more than 1 PWM request (eg. PWM fan) on the same GPIO chip.
>
> based on initial work on LK4.4 by Alban Browaeys.
> URL: https://github.com/helios-4/linux-marvell/commit/743ae97
> [Aditya Prayoga: forward port, cleanup]
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Prayoga <aditya@...ol.io>

It would be awesome to get some feedback from the MVEBU maintainers
on this patch set.

Who are most active on Marvell stuff these days? Thomas?

Likewise I'd be very grateful for a nod from the PWM maintainer that
this is OK with him.

Yours,
Linus Walleij