[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180829184925.64caee4dadf705080373f84f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:49:25 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] x86/mm: temporary mm struct
On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 01:11:43 -0700
Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>
> Sometimes we want to set a temporary page-table entries (PTEs) in one of
> the cores, without allowing other cores to use - even speculatively -
> these mappings. There are two benefits for doing so:
>
> (1) Security: if sensitive PTEs are set, temporary mm prevents their use
> in other cores. This hardens the security as it prevents exploding a
> dangling pointer to overwrite sensitive data using the sensitive PTE.
>
> (2) Avoiding TLB shootdowns: the PTEs do not need to be flushed in
> remote page-tables.
>
> To do so a temporary mm_struct can be used. Mappings which are private
> for this mm can be set in the userspace part of the address-space.
> During the whole time in which the temporary mm is loaded, interrupts
> must be disabled.
>
> The first use-case for temporary PTEs, which will follow, is for poking
> the kernel text.
>
> [ Commit message was written by Nadav ]
>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index eeeb9289c764..96afc8c0cf15 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -338,4 +338,24 @@ static inline unsigned long __get_current_cr3_fast(void)
> return cr3;
> }
>
> +typedef struct {
> + struct mm_struct *prev;
> +} temporary_mm_state_t;
> +
> +static inline temporary_mm_state_t use_temporary_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> + temporary_mm_state_t state;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> + state.prev = this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm);
> + switch_mm_irqs_off(NULL, mm, current);
> + return state;
> +}
Hmm, why don't we return mm_struct *prev directly?
Thank you,
> +
> +static inline void unuse_temporary_mm(temporary_mm_state_t prev)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> + switch_mm_irqs_off(NULL, prev.prev, current);
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_MMU_CONTEXT_H */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists