linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic NAND flash controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5061c929-8db0-3f4c-ec34-303fc351dfdd@amlogic.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:29:05 +0800
From:   Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
CC:     Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
        <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic
 NAND flash controller


On 8/29/2018 6:08 PM, Liang Yang wrote:
> 
> On 8/28/2018 9:26 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 21:21:48 +0800
>> Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Boris,
>>>
>>> On 8/24/2018 8:48 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 22:08:42 +0800
>>>> Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com> wrote:
>>>>>> You have to wait tWB, that's for sure.
>>>>> we have a maximum 32 commands fifo. when command is written into
>>>>> NFC_REG_CMD, it doesn't mean that command is executing right now, 
>>>>> maybe
>>>>> it is buffering on the queue.Assume one ERASE operation, when 2nd
>>>>> command(0xd0) is written into NFC_REG_CMD and then come into
>>>>> NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR, if I read the RB status by register, it may be
>>>>> wrong because 0xd0 may not being executed. it is unusual unless
>>>>> buffering two many command.
>>>>
>>>> You should flush the queue and wait for it to empty at the end of
>>>> ->exec_op().
>>>>> so it seems that i still need to use nand_soft_waitrdy or wait cmd is
>>>>> executed somewhere.
>>>>
>>>> Don't you have a WAIT_FOR_RB instruction? What is NFC_CMD_RB for? Also,
>>>> NFC_CMD_IDLE seems to allow you to add an arbitrary delay, and that's
>>>> probably what you should use for tWB.
>>>>
>>>> em, I can wait for RB by reading the status from register now. but when
>>> calling nand_soft_waitrdy, i really met a problem. One *jiffies* is
>>> about 4ms. When programming, it pass 1ms to
>>> instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms and nand_soft_waitrdy will be only one
>>> *jiffies* to reach timeout. And then calling nand_soft_waitrdy maybe at
>>> the tail of 4ms interval, it may only wait 100us and next jiffies
>>> arrive. Is it correct?
>>
>> Hm, no. If you initialize the time you compare to (using time_before()
>> or time_after()) correctly it should not happen. Anyway, I keep thinking
>> this is not how it should be done. Did you try NFC_CMD_RB? Did you ask
>> HW designers what it was created for?
>>
> I am using NFC_CMD_RB and checking with irq. it is ok now.
there are two usages for NFC_CMD_RB. One reads the data status 
continuously by hardware after sending 0x70 command; the other checks 
the r/b IO status continuously.both can send irq when r/b is ready.

>> .
>>