[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <177be6f0-fb47-feb6-e76a-803e8c6938b6@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:44:31 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
Billows Wu <billows.wu@...soc.com>,
Jason Wu <jason.wu@...soc.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 3/9] mmc: sdhci: Change SDMA address register for v4
mode
On 29/08/18 10:02, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> According to the SD host controller specification version 4.10, when
> Host Version 4 is enabled, SDMA uses ADMA System Address register
> (05Fh-058h) instead of using SDMA System Address register to
> support both 32-bit and 64-bit addressing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index 0c61105..6fb70da 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static void sdhci_adma_table_post(struct sdhci_host *host,
> }
> }
>
> -static u32 sdhci_sdma_address(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +static dma_addr_t sdhci_sdma_address(struct sdhci_host *host)
> {
> if (host->bounce_buffer)
> return host->bounce_addr;
> @@ -735,6 +735,17 @@ static u32 sdhci_sdma_address(struct sdhci_host *host)
> return sg_dma_address(host->data->sg);
> }
>
> +static void sdhci_set_sdma_addr(struct sdhci_host *host, dma_addr_t addr)
> +{
> + if (host->v4_mode) {
> + sdhci_writel(host, addr, SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS);
> + if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA)
> + sdhci_writel(host, (u64)addr >> 32, SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS_HI);
> + } else {
> + sdhci_writel(host, addr, SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static unsigned int sdhci_target_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host,
> struct mmc_command *cmd,
> struct mmc_data *data)
> @@ -994,8 +1005,7 @@ static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd)
> SDHCI_ADMA_ADDRESS_HI);
> } else {
> WARN_ON(sg_cnt != 1);
> - sdhci_writel(host, sdhci_sdma_address(host),
> - SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
> + sdhci_set_sdma_addr(host, sdhci_sdma_address(host));
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2830,7 +2840,7 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
> * some controllers are faulty, don't trust them.
> */
> if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DMA_END) {
> - u32 dmastart, dmanow;
> + dma_addr_t dmastart, dmanow;
>
> dmastart = sdhci_sdma_address(host);
> dmanow = dmastart + host->data->bytes_xfered;
> @@ -2838,12 +2848,12 @@ static void sdhci_data_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
> * Force update to the next DMA block boundary.
> */
> dmanow = (dmanow &
> - ~(SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE - 1)) +
> + ~((dma_addr_t)SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE - 1)) +
> SDHCI_DEFAULT_BOUNDARY_SIZE;
> host->data->bytes_xfered = dmanow - dmastart;
> - DBG("DMA base 0x%08x, transferred 0x%06x bytes, next 0x%08x\n",
> - dmastart, host->data->bytes_xfered, dmanow);
> - sdhci_writel(host, dmanow, SDHCI_DMA_ADDRESS);
> + DBG("DMA base %pad, transferred 0x%06x bytes, next %pad\n",
> + &dmastart, host->data->bytes_xfered, &dmanow);
> + sdhci_set_sdma_addr(host, dmanow);
> }
>
> if (intmask & SDHCI_INT_DATA_END) {
> @@ -3590,8 +3600,8 @@ int sdhci_setup_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
> }
> }
>
> - /* SDMA does not support 64-bit DMA */
> - if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA)
> + /* SDMA does not support 64-bit DMA if v4 mode not set */
> + if ((host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA) && !host->v4_mode)
> host->flags &= ~SDHCI_USE_SDMA;
>
> if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_ADMA) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists