[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb7OEC8ZFNOU915aD2e=PzOk1DasmaAq-oHCeSYVrnuTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 13:55:24 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Cc: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
"S-k, Shyam-sundar" <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
"Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>,
Ken Xue <Ken.Xue@....com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl/amd: use byte access to clear irq/wake status bits
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 6:57 PM Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org> wrote:
> Commit 6afb10267c1692 ("pinctrl/amd: fix masking of GPIO interrupts")
> changed to the clearing of interrupt status bits to a RMW in a critical
> section. This works, but is a bit overkill.
>
> The relevant interrupt/wake status bits are in the Most Significant Byte
> of a 32-bit word. These two are the only write-able bits in this byte.
>
> Therefore, it should be safe to just write these bits back as a byte
> access without any additional locking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
The build robot is complaining about the syntax.
Is this fixable? Maybe you already sent a new patch... I will
see when I reach the top of my inbox.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists