[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0cb6bb7c-776b-28d6-65a6-f5b496e32344@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:19:04 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Dmitry Safonov <dima@...sta.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@....fi>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@...wei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] tty: Hold tty_ldisc_lock() during tty_reopen()
On 2018/08/29 11:23, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> tty_ldisc_reinit() doesn't race with neither tty_ldisc_hangup()
> nor set_ldisc() nor tty_ldisc_release() as they use tty lock.
> But it races with anyone who expects line discipline to be the same
> after hoding read semaphore in tty_ldisc_ref().
>
> We've seen the following crash on v4.9.108 stable:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000000000002260
> IP: [..] n_tty_receive_buf_common+0x5f/0x86d
> Workqueue: events_unbound flush_to_ldisc
> Call Trace:
> [..] n_tty_receive_buf2
> [..] tty_ldisc_receive_buf
> [..] flush_to_ldisc
> [..] process_one_work
> [..] worker_thread
> [..] kthread
> [..] ret_from_fork
>
> I think, tty_ldisc_reinit() should be called with ldisc_sem hold for
> writing, which will protect any reader against line discipline changes.
>
> Note: I failed to reproduce the described crash, so obiviously can't
> guarantee that this is the place where line discipline was switched.
This will be same with a report at
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f08670354701fa64cc0dd3c0128a491bdb16adcc .
syzbot is now testing a patch from Jiri Slaby.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists