linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/19] rcu: Report expedited grace periods at context-switch time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180829222047.319-8-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:20:36 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/19] rcu: Report expedited grace periods at context-switch time

This commit reduces the latency of expedited RCU grace periods by
reporting a quiescent state for the CPU at context-switch time.
In CONFIG_PREEMPT=y kernels, if the outgoing task is still within an
RCU read-side critical section (and thus still blocking some grace
period, perhaps including this expedited grace period), then that task
will already have been placed on one of the leaf rcu_node structures'
->blkd_tasks list.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index c686bf63bba5..0d7107fb3dec 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(void)
 static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(bool preempt)
 {
 	struct task_struct *t = current;
-	struct rcu_data *rdp;
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rcu_state_p->rda);
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
 
 	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
@@ -341,7 +341,6 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(bool preempt)
 	    !t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked) {
 
 		/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
-		rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rcu_state_p->rda);
 		rnp = rdp->mynode;
 		raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp);
 		t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = true;
@@ -383,6 +382,8 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(bool preempt)
 	 * means that we continue to block the current grace period.
 	 */
 	rcu_preempt_qs();
+	if (rdp->deferred_qs)
+		rcu_report_exp_rdp(rcu_state_p, rdp, true);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.17.1