linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/21] staging:rtl8192u: Rename AdvCoding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180830082305.umqtq3fdexlyvn65@mwanda>
Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 11:23:05 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] staging:rtl8192u: Rename AdvCoding - Style

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 09:35:27PM +0100, John Whitmore wrote:
> Rename the bit field element AdvCoding, as it causes a checkpatch issue
> with CamelCase naming. As the element is not actually used in code it
> has been renamed to 'not_used_adv_coding'.
> 
> The single line of code which initialises the bit has been removed,
> as the  field is unused.
> 
> This is a purely coding style change which should have no impact
> on runtime code execution.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h     | 2 +-
>  drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HTProc.c | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
> index 64d5359cf7e2..66a0274077d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/ieee80211/rtl819x_HT.h
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ enum ht_extension_chan_offset {
>  
>  struct ht_capability_ele {
>  	//HT capability info
> -	u8	AdvCoding:1;
> +	u8	not_used_adv_coding:1;

I can't review any more of this patchset when this is the first line...

:(

regards,
dan carpenter