[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180830092219.GA5352@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:22:20 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
mhocko@...e.cz, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: mmotm 2018-08-23-17-26 uploaded
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 02:26:51PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> On 8/30/2018 9:00 AM, Jia He Wrote:
> > On 8/30/2018 7:22 AM, Andrew Morton Wrote:
> >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:20:46 +0800 Jia He <hejianet@...il.com> wrote:
> >>> FYI,I watched a lockdep warning based on your mmotm master branch[1]
> >>
> >> Thanks. We'll need help from ARM peeps on this please.
> >>
> >>> [ 6.692731] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >>> [ 6.696391] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!current->hardirqs_enabled)
[...]
> >>> I thought the root cause might be at [2] which seems not in your branch yet.
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://git.cmpxchg.org/cgit.cgi/linux-mmotm.git
> >>> [2]
> >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=efd112
> >>
> >> I agree, that doesn't look like the culprit. But something may well
> >> have gone wrong in "the recent conversion of the syscall entry/exit
> >> code to C".
> > Sorry for my unclearly previously description.
> > 1. no such lockdep warning in latest mainline kernel git tree.
> > 2. there is a 100% producible warning based on your latest mmotm tree
> > 3. after applying the commit efd112 based on your mmotm tree, the warning
> > disappearred
> >
> > I will do some further digging to answer your question if no other experts' help
> >
> 1. in el0_svc->el0_svc_common, without commit efd112
> local_daif_mask(); //disable the irq and trace irq off
> flags = current_thread_info()->flags;
> if (!has_syscall_work(flags))
> ------------ //1
> return;
> If el0_svc_common enters the logic at line 1, the irq is disabled and
> current->hardirqs_enabled is 0.
>
> 2. then it goes to el0_da
> in el0_da, it enables the irq without changing current->hardirqs_enabled to 1
>
> 3. goes to el0_da->do_mem_abort->... the lockdep warning happens
>
> The commit efd112 fixes it by invoking trace_hardirqs_off at line 1.
> It closes the inconsistency window.
Right, we fixed this last month in commit efd112353bf7 ("arm64: svc: Ensure
hardirq tracing is updated before return"). Is there anything more you need
from us on the Arm side?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists