[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180830135855.rylamc7mx2ur3tab@kshutemo-mobl1>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:58:56 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add restrictions for kexec/kdump jumping between
5-level and 4-level kernel
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:16:21PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> This was suggested by Kirill several months ago, I worked out several
> patches to fix, then interrupted by other issues. So sort them out
> now and post for reviewing.
Thanks for doing this.
> The current upstream kernel supports 5-level paging mode and supports
> dynamically choosing paging mode during bootup according to kernel
> image, hardware and kernel parameter setting. This flexibility brings
> several issues for kexec/kdump:
> 1)
> Switching between paging modes, requires changes into target kernel.
> It means you cannot kexec() 4-level paging kernel from 5-level paging
> kernel if 4-level paging kernel doesn't include changes.
>
> 2)
> Switching from 5-level paging to 4-level paging kernel would fail, if
> kexec() put kernel image above 64TiB of memory.
I'm not entirely sure that 64TiB is the limit here. Technically, 4-level
paging allows to address 256TiB in 1-to-1 mapping. We just don't have
machines with that wide physical address space (which don't support
5-level paging too).
What is your reasoning about 64TiB limit?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists