[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180830142920.GO24082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:29:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com" <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch "asm-generic/bitops/lock.h: Rewrite using atomic_fetch_"
causes kernel crash
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 03:23:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Yes, that would be worth trying. However, I also just noticed that the
> fetch-ops (which are now used to implement test_and_set_bit_lock()) seem
> to be missing the backwards branch in the LL/SC case. Yet another diff
> below.
>
> Will
>
> --->8
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h
> index 4e0072730241..f06c5ed672b3 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h
> +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/atomic.h
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline int atomic_fetch_##op(int i, atomic_t *v) \
> "1: llock %[orig], [%[ctr]] \n" \
> " " #asm_op " %[val], %[orig], %[i] \n" \
> " scond %[val], [%[ctr]] \n" \
> - " \n" \
> + " bnz 1b \n" \
> : [val] "=&r" (val), \
> [orig] "=&r" (orig) \
> : [ctr] "r" (&v->counter), \
ACK!! sorry about that, no idea how I messed that up.
Also, once it all works, they should look at switching to _relaxed
atomics for LL/SC.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists