[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180830144155.GB27233@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 07:41:55 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
jason@...edaemon.net, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
dmitriy@...-tech.org, jeremy.linton@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, atish.patra@....com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] RISC-V: Use mmgrab()
> +#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> @@ -79,8 +80,8 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
> * the spinning harts that they can continue the boot process.
> */
> smp_mb();
> - __cpu_up_stack_pointer[cpu] = task_stack_page(tidle) + THREAD_SIZE;
> - __cpu_up_task_pointer[cpu] = tidle;
> + WRITE_ONCE(__cpu_up_stack_pointer[cpu], task_stack_page(tidle) + THREAD_SIZE);
> + WRITE_ONCE(__cpu_up_task_pointer[cpu], tidle);
This looks unrelated.
> @@ -100,7 +101,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init smp_callin(void)
> struct mm_struct *mm = &init_mm;
>
> /* All kernel threads share the same mm context. */
> - atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
> + mmgrab(mm);
> current->active_mm = mm;
This part looks fine to me:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists