linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: avoid wrong decrypted data from disk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:20:12 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: avoid wrong decrypted data from disk

On 2018/8/30 9:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> 1. Create a file in an encrypted directory
> 2. Do GC & drop caches
> 3. Read stale data before its bio for metapage was not issued yet
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> ---
> Change log from v1:
>  - move to bio != NULL
> 
>  fs/f2fs/data.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 382c1ef9a9e4..159e411785e9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -1556,6 +1556,12 @@ static int f2fs_mpage_readpages(struct address_space *mapping,
>  				bio = NULL;
>  				goto set_error_page;
>  			}
> +		} else if (unlikely(f2fs_encrypted_file(inode))) {

For android scenario, encryption becomes a common case now, so I think we can
remove unlikely here.

> +			/*
> +			 * If the page is under writeback, we need to wait for
> +			 * its completion to see the correct decrypted data.
> +			 */
> +			f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback(F2FS_I_SB(inode), block_nr);
>  		}

Look at this again, it seems f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback() is not related to
f2fs_grab_read_bio(), so we can move it here to make code logic more clear:

if (f2fs_encrypted_file(inode)) {
	/* */
	f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback(F2FS_I_SB(inode), block_nr);
}

Also, in f2fs_submit_page_read(), we need to adjust to:

- f2fs_grab_read_bio()
- f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback()
- bio_add_page()

How do you think?

Thanks,

>  
>  		if (bio_add_page(bio, page, blocksize, 0) < blocksize)
>