lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:15:38 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, benh@....ibm.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, npiggin@...il.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] arm64: tlb: Justify non-leaf invalidation in flush_tlb_range()

Add a comment to explain why we can't get away with last-level
invalidation in flush_tlb_range()

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index e257f8655b84..ddbf1718669d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -182,6 +182,10 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 static inline void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 				   unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
 {
+	/*
+	 * We cannot use leaf-only invalidation here, since we may be invalidating
+	 * table entries as part of collapsing hugepages or moving page tables.
+	 */
 	__flush_tlb_range(vma, start, end, false);
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists