[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180830171510.GQ24082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 19:15:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>
Cc: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com" <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch "asm-generic/bitops/lock.h: Rewrite using atomic_fetch_"
causes kernel crash
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 02:46:16PM +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-08-30 at 16:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 11:53:17AM +0000, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
> > > I can see crashes with LLSC enabled in both SMP running on 4 cores
> > > and SMP running on 1 core.
> >
> > So you're running on LL/SC enabled hardware; that would make Will's
> > patch irrelevant (although still a good idea for the hardware that does
> > care about that spinlocked atomic crud).
> >
> > Does something like the below cure things? That would confirm the
> > suggestion that the change to __clear_bit_unlock() is the curprit.
>
> I tested it - this doesn't change anything, the problem still reproduces.
OK, 'good' :-)
> I'll test it with last Will fix.
Yes, that missing "bnz 1b" is very very suspect.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists