linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use raw_smp_processor_id() in vmbus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Aug 2018 17:41:09 +0000
From:   Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To:     KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        "'gregkh@...uxfoundation.org'" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
CC:     "'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "'driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org'" 
        <driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
        "'olaf@...fle.de'" <olaf@...fle.de>,
        "'apw@...onical.com'" <apw@...onical.com>,
        "'jasowang@...hat.com'" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "'marcelo.cerri@...onical.com'" <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use raw_smp_processor_id() in
 vmbus_connect()

> From: KY Srinivasan
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 10:32
> > >          */
> > >    if (version >= VERSION_WIN8_1) {
> > >        msg->target_vcpu =
> > > -            hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(smp_processor_id());
> > > -       vmbus_connection.connect_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >
> > > +       hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(get_cpu());
> > > +       vmbus_connection.connect_cpu = msg->target_vcpu;
> > > +       put_cpu();
> >
> > While the warning " BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible" can also
> > be avoided, the line
> > +	vmbus_connection.connect_cpu = msg->target_vcpu;
> > seems incorrect, as the "connect_cpu" should reflect Linux CPU numbering
> > rather than Hyper-V's vCPU numbering.
> 
> Yes of course!  Can you send me a patch with the fix.
> 
> K. Y

Ok. Will do.

-- Dexuan