lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 31 Aug 2018 09:40:24 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] ata: ahci_platform: support allwinner R40 AHCI

Hi Jens,

On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 08:52:52PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/30/18 8:32 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:31 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/30/18 1:01 PM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> >>> Hello
> >>>
> >>> This patchset add support for allwinner R40 AHCI controller.
> >>>
> >>> The whole patchset is tested on sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra and
> >>> on sun7i-a20-cubieboard2 which doesnt have any of the ressources added
> >>> by this serie, so no regression should come with it.
> >>>
> >>> The last patch(ata: ahci_sunxi: remove PHY code) should not be merged,
> >>> but will be resent for inclustion when all patchs will have hit linus
> >>> tree.
> >>
> >> Applied 1-12 with Hans's blessing, thanks Corentin.
> > 
> > Please don't merge device tree ("dts") patches, i.e. patches 9-12. We will
> > merge them through the sunxi / armsoc tree. Having them in separate trees
> > introduces conflicts when we have other stuff going through our tree.
> 
> OK, fair enough, I can drop those.

And the DT bits actually have some issues that would need to change
the code significantly.

Can you drop all of them please?

Thanks!
Maxmie

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists