lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:26:56 +0900
From:   Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
To:     Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc:     Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>, kamil@...as.org,
        a.hajda@...sung.com, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        jtp.park@...sung.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
        andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com, todor.tomov@...aro.org,
        Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>,
        Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.org, ezequiel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: docs-rst: Document memory-to-memory video
 decoder interface

Hi Tomasz, just a few thoughts I came across while writing the
stateless codec document:

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:06 PM Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org> wrote:
[snip]
> +****************************************
> +Memory-to-memory Video Decoder Interface
> +****************************************

Since we have a m2m stateless decoder interface, can we call this the
m2m video *stateful* decoder interface? :)

> +Conventions and notation used in this document
> +==============================================
[snip]
> +Glossary
> +========

I think these sections apply to both stateless and stateful. How about
moving then into dev-codec.rst and mentioning that they apply to the
two following sections?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists