[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPBb6MXT4jiQXfgzq8fpXSQTsdcF0UZLB=RQ6itH5-JZx-27FA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 17:26:56 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>, kamil@...as.org,
a.hajda@...sung.com, Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
jtp.park@...sung.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com, todor.tomov@...aro.org,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.org, ezequiel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: docs-rst: Document memory-to-memory video
decoder interface
Hi Tomasz, just a few thoughts I came across while writing the
stateless codec document:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:06 PM Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org> wrote:
[snip]
> +****************************************
> +Memory-to-memory Video Decoder Interface
> +****************************************
Since we have a m2m stateless decoder interface, can we call this the
m2m video *stateful* decoder interface? :)
> +Conventions and notation used in this document
> +==============================================
[snip]
> +Glossary
> +========
I think these sections apply to both stateless and stateful. How about
moving then into dev-codec.rst and mentioning that they apply to the
two following sections?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists