[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180831083316.GR24082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 10:33:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mojha@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:smp/urgent] cpu/hotplug: Remove skip_onerr field from
cpuhp_step structure
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 04:03:58AM -0700, tip-bot for Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> Commit-ID: 935aad3015fb4afc0b7ef6e6c18175b95461de47
> Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/935aad3015fb4afc0b7ef6e6c18175b95461de47
> Author: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@...eaurora.org>
> AuthorDate: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 12:24:54 +0530
> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CommitDate: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 12:59:30 +0200
> @@ -644,12 +637,6 @@ static void cpuhp_thread_fun(unsigned int cpu)
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!cpuhp_is_ap_state(state));
>
> - if (st->rollback) {
> - struct cpuhp_step *step = cpuhp_get_step(state);
> - if (step->skip_onerr)
> - goto next;
> - }
> -
> if (cpuhp_is_atomic_state(state)) {
> local_irq_disable();
> st->result = cpuhp_invoke_callback(cpu, state, bringup, st->node, &st->last);
Can you fold this in?
../kernel/cpu.c: In function ‘cpuhp_thread_fun’:
../kernel/cpu.c:663:1: warning: label ‘next’ defined but not used [-Wunused-label]
---
kernel/cpu.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index c544baf75e77..aa7fe85ad62e 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -660,7 +660,6 @@ static void cpuhp_thread_fun(unsigned int cpu)
st->should_run = false;
}
-next:
cpuhp_lock_release(bringup);
if (!st->should_run)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists