[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1535709787.32173.33.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 18:03:07 +0800
From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] usb: core: phy: fix return value checking about
devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 11:41 +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:16:40AM +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> > Use IS_ERR() instead of IS_ERR_OR_NULL() because devm_of_phy_get_by_index()
> > never return NULL value;
> > But still need ignore the error of -ENODEV, for more information, please
> > refer to:
> > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/19/88
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10160181/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > V3: abandon the ternary operator suggested by Johan
> >
> > V2: keep the -ENODEV check
>
> Perhaps the patch Subject is a little misleading as this is more of a
> clean up than a fix (as there's no bug here).
>
> But apart from that this looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Sent a new version, thanks
>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/core/phy.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> > index 9879767..38b2c77 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/phy.c
> > @@ -23,10 +23,11 @@ static int usb_phy_roothub_add_phy(struct device *dev, int index,
> > struct list_head *list)
> > {
> > struct usb_phy_roothub *roothub_entry;
> > - struct phy *phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> > + struct phy *phy;
> >
> > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
> > - if (!phy || PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> > + phy = devm_of_phy_get_by_index(dev, dev->of_node, index);
> > + if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(phy) == -ENODEV)
> > return 0;
> > else
> > return PTR_ERR(phy);
>
> Thanks,
> Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists