[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180831101315.GM28861@localhost>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 12:13:15 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: "Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)" <hpeter@...il.com>
Cc: johan@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peter_hong@...tek.com.tw, hpeter+linux_kernel@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] serial: f81232: implement break control
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 09:55:46AM +0800, Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong) wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> This article is duplication with
> [PATCH V2 3/4] USB: serial: f81232: implement break control
> [PATCH V2 3/4] serial: f81232: implement break control
> (Title not start with USB token)
>
> Should I discard this PATCH_V2 series and re-send PATCH_V3 ?
> or could you discard the patch - serial: f81232: implement break control
> only ?
Yes, no problem, so no need to resend. But thanks for highlighting this.
I'll try to look at these next week.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists