[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180831115350.GC8437@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 04:53:50 -0700
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/topology: Expose numa_mask set/clear functions
to arch
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> [2018-08-31 13:26:39]:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 01:12:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > NAK, not until you've fixed every cpu_to_node() user in the kernel to
> > deal with that mask changing.
>
> Also, what happens if userspace reads that information; uses libnuma and
> then you go and shift the world underneath their feet?
>
> > This is absolutely insane.
>
The topology events are suppose to be very rare.
>From whatever small experiments I have done till now, unless tasks are
bound to both cpu and memory, they seem to be coping well with topology
updates. I know things weren't optimal after a topology change but they
worked. Now after 051f3ca02e46 "Introduce NUMA identity node sched
domain", systems stall. I am only exploring at ways to keep them working
as much as they were before that commit.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists