lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 31 Aug 2018 08:35:23 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        LABBE Corentin <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] ata: ahci_platform: support allwinner R40 AHCI

On 8/31/18 1:40 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 08:52:52PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 8/30/18 8:32 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:31 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 8/30/18 1:01 PM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset add support for allwinner R40 AHCI controller.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole patchset is tested on sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra and
>>>>> on sun7i-a20-cubieboard2 which doesnt have any of the ressources added
>>>>> by this serie, so no regression should come with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> The last patch(ata: ahci_sunxi: remove PHY code) should not be merged,
>>>>> but will be resent for inclustion when all patchs will have hit linus
>>>>> tree.
>>>>
>>>> Applied 1-12 with Hans's blessing, thanks Corentin.
>>>
>>> Please don't merge device tree ("dts") patches, i.e. patches 9-12. We will
>>> merge them through the sunxi / armsoc tree. Having them in separate trees
>>> introduces conflicts when we have other stuff going through our tree.
>>
>> OK, fair enough, I can drop those.
> 
> And the DT bits actually have some issues that would need to change
> the code significantly.
> 
> Can you drop all of them please?

OK, can do. Corentin, please resend when everybody is happy with it.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists